While she said an ordinary gambler may find information on gambling machines about returns confusing, “I have found any such impression formed would be dispelled as soon as she or he actually starts gambling and the randomness of the operation of the machine and returns become apparent”. Lawyers representing Guy, Ron Merkel and Peter Gray, argued the machines were designed unfairly and players were not properly informed about their prospects of winning, which they argued was a breach of consumer law.īut delivering her judgement in Melbourne on Friday following a three-week hearing in September, Justice Debra Mortimer found the design features of the machine did not amount to misleading or unconscionable conduct.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |